About Me

Name: Tom G.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama's Moral Compass is stuck...so are most liberals'

When you listen to Liberals and, more recently Obama himself, during the Saddleback event, you see that their moral compass is stuck...stuck on Relativism.
When Warren asked Obama about America's moral failure, Obama answered..,

Obama: I think America's greatest moral failure in my lifetime has been that we still don't abide by that basic precept in Matthew that whatever you do for the least of my brothers you do for me. And that notion of -- that basic principle applies to poverty. It applies to racism and sexism. It applies to, you know, not thinking about providing ladders of opportunity for people to get into the middle class.

I mean, there's a pervasive sense, I think, that this country, as wealthy and powerful as we are, still don't spend enough time thinking about "the least of these."

This is so endemic of Liberals...not seeing the forest through the trees. They (Liberals and Obama) often speak of Civil Rights and the causes of the poor, less fortunate as a motivating catch all for Liberal Policy's moral necessity. Yet, they are stuck on Relativism, they fail to see the order of things, the primordial nature of life.
One cannot be eight before one is seven, nor can one climb to 27,000 feet before 26,999...simple enough for a child to understand, eh. However the importance of this Primordial nature of things fails the gravity of Democratic, Liberal and, in particular, Obama politics.  
 
One cannot begin fighting for the causes of the poor, the less fortunate, the class struggles, the weak or as the Gospel of Matthew offers, the "least of these" without first fighting for the least of us, the unborn child! We cannot pick up this fight after they are no longer 'the least of these".
 
For, the goal is to protect those 'least' able to protect themselves, 'least' able to to fight for themselves, 'least' able to express their natural rights as granted by our creator. Our Declaration of Independence is clear on this fact, this Primordial nature of things.
 
Obama wishes, as most liberals do, to by-pass the 'least' of us and move to those 'most' likely to vote based upon their current condition.
 
This 'by-passing' is a decision based upon the relative nature of power. The threat to this power is the Creator himself. IF the unborn (man) is created in his image, then killing that unborn child is killing him. The power obtained by committing this act of killing, is an act of power over those who believe in the Creator. This is truly a fight for the soul of America.
 
Obama professed a faith in a Christian belief while holding the most preciously vulnerable hostage.
 
Warren also asked Obama about his most glaring Moral weakness...to which he replied..,

Obama: Well, in my own life, I'd break it up into stages. I had a difficult youth. My father wasn't in the house. I've written about this. You know, there were times when I experimented with drugs, I drank, you know, in my teenage years. And what I trace this to is a certain selfishness on my part. I was so obsessed with me and, you know, the reasons that I might be dissatisfied that I couldn't focus on other people. And you know, I think the process for me of growing up was to recognize that it's not about me. It's about --[Warren: I like that. I like that.]

Absolutely. But look, you know, when I find myself taking the wrong step, I think a lot of times it's because I'm trying to protect myself instead of do God's work.
Again Obama is failing to see the work God asks us to do...help the 'least of these'...the unborn child. IF we cannot start by protecting them, how could they justify this to God himself...how could they really believe that God would find killing the weak, the innocent the powerless an act of his will. They do not believe this is O.K. at 3 weeks of age, or 27 years, why is it OK to do so a conception plus 90 days? Or, anytime?
 
Abortion is the Slavery issue of our day and for an African American candidate to fail to see the primordial nature of life is a failure of our educational system. Few people have the unique vantage point and nearness to the issue of having the law deem you unworthy as do African Americans. The remarkable, sometimes frustrating, empathy the Israeli Jews show to the Palestinians’ who are in Settlements is a living example of this perspective in use.
 
Today, too many Catholics, Evangelicals, Protestants and other Christians fail to place proper order, fail to see the primordial nature of life, and thus allow themselves to be manipulated by those who only aim to weaken their  relationship with the Creator. The Polar North of the Moral Compass is not negotiable and is not Relative, it is singular and precise--it is the Truth.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Typical White Person--is Barrack a Racist?

   Barrack Obama continues to want America to believe he is not like his Pastor of twenty (20) years. He wants us to believe that the comments made by his wife do not relect the acceptance in his family of the line of thinking they have been exposed to over the many years attending Trinity United. Barrack wants us to believe that his children and other children who go to this Church do not come away with a distorted or biased view of America and our Race Relations. Barrack Obama wants us to ignore the fact he allowed  his Children and others' children to be witness to these disgraceful, prejudiced and disgusting rants by Rev. Wright. Barrack wants America to see him differently than he sees his own Grandmother, whom he calls a Typical White Person...isn't this the kind of talk he claims is wrong for America...Do as a want to say, not as I say, mentality.
 
Barrack has claimed his Rev. did not influence his way of thinking, and that he found Wrights' Sermons regretable and wrong, yet he still donated incredibly large sums of money to help allow him to pontificate about such things without nary a word from Barrack. Barrack wants us to beleive he did not support his Pastors language but it should not have affected his decision to allow him to be an Advisor to the Campaign.
 
Barrack wants to lecture the American People about Race relations while calling people by the very sterotypical references he condemns, no less than the women who helped to raise him, he calls her a Typical White Person!?
 
Why is America allowing for the double standard to continue to permiate the Media Culture. Why are we the Racists, when untold Millions of American's are voting for him all over the country. Yet, black Americans are supporting him at a 90% clip. Are we to believe Race does not factor into their decisions  For some reason, we are asked to not consider this a form a racism and that it is White America that is Racist.
 
The numbers would suggest just the opposite, that Black America is experiencind and demonstrating Racism, placing it above the quality of the Candidate. Statistically, it is far to broad of support for it to be anything else.
 
Ultimately, Obama is the product of a Media unwilling to scrutinize the Black Candidate for President for many reasons. Yes, the willingness to allow for 84% positive stories to butress his Campaign reflects the Media interest in advancing the Social Issue of his Campaign over the News and unbaised approach usually expected.
 
Obama has received not the slightest scrutiny from the Media until recently, and it may be too late for the other Democratic Candidate, oh what is her name?? Obama has the ability to transcend race, but he has not shown the willingness or Character to do so. The media built thsi Campaign up to the point of Messiah and now the scrutiny is coming from the fringe.
 
We are still seeing the Kid Gloves affect wtih Obama and the allowance to not expect higher standards of his conduct.
 
Obama attended a Church led by a Racist, and Anti-American Bigot, a man who is full of rage and hate. Yet we are asked to believe that Obama and his family have not been affected by this, however, his use of Typical White Person reflects a Sterotypical View of White American's.
 
I think when Barrcak is alone and looks into the mirror he sees someone very different than we see in the Candidate Barrack.
Tags: obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Symbolism over Substance--so far for the DEMS

The meteoric rise of Obama has coincided with the realities found inside the Democratic Party today. People all over the nation are beginning to realize they do not want the Clinton's in the White House. The hangover of the Clinton years is have a heavy price and it is being seen by the heavy rush towards Obama. He represents the anti-Clinton vote as much as the willingness to accept his candidacy. This is not to say his message is not exciting and grabbing his audiences, rather it is to say that it has more to do with the Symbol of his campaign-CHANGE over the Substance of the Hillary campaign.

The SYMBOLISM of the Barrack Obama is of an exciting, young, enthusiastic well spoken man, who plays upon the LIBERAL and HUMANISTIC willingness to qualify the hope of us all to move past the racism of our past. Liberals in particular want to be able to say I voted for a Black Man for President irrespective of whether he is the best candidate. Obama, however, has shown to be a very good candidate, but one yet to be challenged due to his blackness.

The historic moment we are experiencing is also replete with problems. One of which is that we are seeing a FEAR in the media to really scrutinize his record thus far. The KIT gloves approach has allowed for him to be protected, and the attacks from the Clinton machine has appeared to be and depicted as smears.

The Media has left him alone, allowing for him to rise unabated. But Why?

Because they love to see there principles attained through a candidate they like, and Barrack is everything the liberal media likes, he fulfills there best hopes for America. Hence their reluctance to scrutinize his campaign and past. The media loves the SYMBOLISM of what Barrack represents to them and liberal America.

Whereas, Hillary embodies the sparks that ignited the Republican Revolution and the Bush years. She and her husband embody the SUBSTANCE of the corruption and the decline of ethics in the recent past. The things that most Americans hate about Washington is what the Clinton's are.

The SUBSTANCE of corruption in D.C. is what Americans want to distance themselves from, all the infighting and investigations that pepper the last decade and half. This is the Clintons, and people are tired of it everywhere.

So the Symbolism of Liberalism as it is found in Barrack Obama is winning the day against the Substance of the Clinton years...and people everywhere are accepting it. The willingness to see all roses and candy in the light of Obama's eyes is blinding the media and democrats, if it is necessary to separate the two, and propelling him to the pinnacle of politics.

All this Messianic anointing of Obama as the cure for all the ills of our past has allowed him to move through this usual gauntlet without the slightest of bruises. Obama has enjoyed the easiest run for President in any one's memory, all because he is a black man.

I ask what has Barrack accomplished in his 46 years? It is not his impressive list of accomplishments that have vaulted him to the center of the political universe, because they are neither impressive nor extra ordinary but rather because he is the embodiment of the what Liberals hold dear--Symbolism over Substance.



So this primary has become a case of Symbolism over Substance
Tags: obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Politics of CHANGE

Obama's politics of Change is more of the same...

Barrack Obama likes to talk about Change from the politics of usual...the same bitterness of partisanship. He likes to point out that we need a candidate and President who will not look at the Party platform but rather look toward solutions to bring the Nation together. Often his rhetoric is that the CHANGE we need is to distance ourselves from the way the Dems and GOP have played partisan politics for there gain and the Nations loss...breaking us down rather than bringing us todgether. His best Rodney King impersonation.

However, he has, in his short time, been rated by both Liberal and Conservative think tanks and publications as either the most liberal or nearly the most liberal member of the Senate. He has not worked in non-partisan circles to advance solutions rather he has played the role of pure partisan as a member of the Senate.

Obama's record is replete with partisan stances in issues of importance and real need for bi-partisanship. A look at his short Senate records shows a man who has sat in the far left seat of the Senate while John McCain has taken all the arrows from his conservative base to find that middle ground on issues Barrack holds to his Liberal and Politics as Usual role.
 
Obama sites the possibility of selecting Chuch Hagel as an example of a person he would select to fill a vacancy in his Cabnet should he become President. Here is one Conservative, who sees this as Reason 6073 to vote against Obama!

In fact, McCain not Obama represents the REAL reformer from the Politics as Usual. McCain has a record of working across the aisle and working to form bi-partisan coalitions on Campaign Finance, Immigration, Evironmental and Budgetary issues.

The Media has yet to bring out the facts on Obama's past and purely partisan behavior during his brief stint in the Senate. Additionally, Obama also proved weak-kneed while in the Illionis Legislature by voting 'present' rather than taking serious stands on important issues.

So if you want a REFORMER, a person who is not going look at someone's voter ID card before beginning cordial discussions, and who will reach across the aisle to solve the issues of our day, look no further than John McCain. If you are looking for a Candidate who has experience dealing with issues that require serious and sound judgement, one who has been tested under fire and has worked with whomever is needed to solve an important problem, HIS name is John McCain.
Tags: obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Making Peace inside the Democratic Primary

The time has come for the DEM candidates to live up to the Rhetoric they have spewed over the last many years as it relates to negotiating with our enemies. They are uniquely placed to do just such a thing, to negotiate with our enemies. For nearly the entire Bush Presidency, the DEMS have bemoaned the fact that this administration has been unwilling to negotiate with likes of North Korea, Iran, and other nefarious fellows. Today, they have the unique and sole possibility to live up to their own demands, their own rhetoric.

Currently Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton are nearly tied in the race to the Democratic nomination for President. Neither can win the coveted prize without the others help, or the most unheard and unlikely slide in one or the others favor in the waning days of the primary by nearly a 10 to 1 margin. This is not going to happen!

So, as we look to the potential options left on the table for Barrack and Hillary, we find a fight for Super Delegates as option one. But this option has a very ugly downside for both candidates. They can conceivably break the party in two and ensure a McCain Presidency.

Option two is a negotiated Peace.
The willingness of either or both to negotiate with the enemy of America, the other candidate.

This could be a test to see if the rhetoric spewed by the DEMS and these two candidates is worth its weight in pudding. Can either show the willingness to negotiate from a place of moderate to no advantage and bring abut a settlement that benefits both, or do they continue to blow smoke up the collective buttocks of America.

Obama, in particular, believes it is important to negotiate with the likes of Iran to secure our peace. Does he also see the import to negotiate with Hillary to save his party?

Can either swallow the arrogance of their campaign and begin the negotiating to bring this War of Words to an end without anymore bloodshed of fellow Democrats? Can either find it within themselves to sacrifice for the common good as Mrs. Obama and Mr. Clinton have long argued as it relates to the rest of the country?

Today, looking out upon the landscape of Democratic Politics you see the likelihood of stronger and deeper attacks, particularly from Hillary. While Obama has the long view to stay above the fray, can he seriously believe that he can?

Is the collective egos of Obama and Clinton so entrenched that they cannot see the damage awaiting the bloody battle ahead? The senior Senator of Florida has cautioned about a "Train wreck" ahead should this not be resolved soon.

All the puff media and favorable media received by both candidates between Mid-December and Mid-February will begin to decline and the media will be forced to deal with reality should the two begin the final campaign towards nomination. During the Dec through Feb period, Obama received 83% favorable coverage from network news while Hillary received 53% favorable. These numbers are likely to reverse themselves should they begin the trench warfare that is likely to occur should the negotiated peace not begin soon.

No longer will the biased media coverage be able to steer the reports on the candidates and the result will be bloody. The loss of control of the message beaming out from Network headquarters will be followed by a rapid decline in the favorable appeal of both candidates and it will result in an increase for McCain.

Thus, the only conclusion that can be made is one of a Negotiated Peace Settlement. Luck are we, that we have heard just last week that Hillary was instrumental in bringing Peace to Northern Ireland. We now can sit and watch the grown ups in the room make the tough decisions the current Administration failed to do...Make peace with our Enemies...

The time has come for the rubber to meet the road. We need to see the rhetoric move to action and the Symbolism find its Substance. We need Hillary and Obama to bring themselves to the big Mahogany Table with Claw feet and negotiate the Peace to save the Democratic Party.

If they cannot do it for the Party, at least think of the Children!
Tags: obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »